Wed 12/19/2018 11:29 ET
DJIA23849.25174.100.73%TELCO162.841.090.67%GOLD1259.606.050.48%Shanghai2549.5626.771.05%
S&P 5002564.1418.210.71%BANKS393.533.820.97%OIL47.971.372.86%BITCOIN3829.03116.793.05%
NASDAQ6824.1640.260.59%PHARM549.511.210.22%US/EU1.140.000.01%Futures2566.0027.971.09%
Welcome Stranger!  Please sign up or log in to enable additional features.Sign Up | Mail | Log In
Forum - Trevena, Inc - TRVN   

Msg Top | Msg List | < Prev | Next > | Post New | Reply | Privately | Search | Add TRVN
  
From: burp (Rep: 64) reply to jloren1Date: 10/12/2018 07:17
Forum: Trevena, Inc - Msg #120Thread #674041006 (Rec: 0)
Re: Where did you see that 4 of the no's were close to a yes on the AADPAC webcas...

I Listened to the entire adcom live from 8am... it was pretty pathetic too...TRVN team was perfect..well prpared..answered every question with solid data... then the FDA had their turn... was like listen to a checkout girl at walmart chewing gum...ummm...ahhhh...ummmm... after the vote the independent panel had a chance to explain to explain why the voted yes or no....4 of the "no" clearly stated the efficacy was not an issue...but there simply wasnt enough safety data for them to vote yes comfortably....so TRVN goes into the PDUFA in Nov with just the safety in question...50-50 imo...



Reply to jloren1 - Msg #2756718 - 10/11/2018 17:45

Where did you see that 4 of the no's were close to a yes on the AADPAC webcast? Re: 5:40 ADCOM vote was 8 no 7 yes.. 4 of the "no's said they were close to yes b...
What would you like to do? Message: Endorse | Bookmark | Report AbuseUser burp: Reward | Watch | IgnoreTRVN: Ignore

Msg Top | Msg List | < Prev | Next > | Post New | Reply | Privately | Search | Add TRVN
  

TheLion.com | About Us | Agreement & Disclaimer | Privacy | Twitter
© 1999- TheLion.com, Inc.